France - RECs and Medical Research
History
In France the protection of the person in case of Medical Research is provided by the Huriet-Sérusclat Law of the 20th December 1988 which has most recently been amended in 2004 (Law of the 9th August 2004). The purpose of this recent review was to implement Directive 2001/20/EC.
The authorities for the legal protection of the persons participating to a research and of his/her personal data have to be distinguished from the Ethics Committees who are only concerned with Ethical issues related to research. In France different authorities have different roles for protecting the person and his/her personal data in case of medical research:
- The Committees for the Protection of Persons (CPPs): the committee issues an opinion to the investigator of the biomedical research for the protection of the person and for any subsequent amendments to the research protocol.
- The National Consultative Committee for the processing of Information in the health sector gives an opinion on the processing of personal data in the health sector.
- The CNIL (Data Protection Supervisory Authority) supervises any use of personal data, especially in case of biomedical research and gives its authorisation for the processing of health personal data
- The National Consultative Ethics Committee has a general reflection on ethical issues but do not review research protocol.
- Local and institutional Ethics Committees issue specific and general decisions on ethical issues and rarely review research protocols.
In order for biomedical research to be given approval, a legal procedure has to be followed by the sponsor. If the research involves the processing of personal data, then approval of the research protocol be followed, in parallel, with a separate legal procedure for data processing in order to be lawful. While the research protocol is considered by a CPP and then referred for approval to either the Ministry of Health or the Agency for the Sanitary Security of Health Products, data protection issues are considered separately by the National Consultative Committee on the processing of Information in the Health Sector and then referred for approval to the Data Protection Supervisory Authority.
Summary of French Research Committees
| Type of REC | Committees for the Protection of Persons (CPPs) | National Consultative Committee on the processing of Information in the Health Sector | CNIL-Data Protection Supervisory Authority |
| Where situated? | 48 CPPs in the French regions | Paris | |
| Who applies to them? | The sponsor | The Controller | The Controller |
| Formal/Informal | Formal | Formal | Formal |
| National/Regional | Regional | National | National |
| Laws Involved | Law Hurriet-Serusclat of 20th December 1988, amended by the Law of 9th August 2004 | Law of the 1st July 1994 modifying the 1978 Act: Official Journal 2nd July 1994 Decree No. 95-682 of the 9th May 1995 for the application of Chapter V of the 1978 Act | Law of the 6th January 1978 on data protection. Law of 1st July 1994 modifying the 1978 act. |
| Guidance Involved |
|
|
Recommendation of the 4th February 1997 of the CNIL on the processing of health personal data |
| Membership requirements |
12 members per CPP:
Specialist doctors Pharmacists Nurses Psychologists An ethicist A sociologist a lawyer Representatives of patients' associations |
14 members and 1 president nominated for 3 years. All members are scientists. |
17 members nominated for 5 years:
|
| Responsible/accountable to whom? | Totally independent | Subordinate to the Ministry of Health | Independent Administrative Authority. Its decision can be appealed to the Administrative judge |
| Mission |
|
|
Supervision, information and advice in relation to the data protection law. |
| Approval or advisory powers | Advisory powers. It is however compulsory to receive their opinion in order to obtain authorisation from the French Agency for the Sanitary Security of Health Products or from the Minister for Health. | Approval powers | Approval powers: The CNIL gives its authorisation. |
Summary of French RECs - table 2
| Type of REC | National Consultative Ethics Committee | Ethics Committees linked to research organisations | Local Ethics Committees |
| Where situated? | Paris | Scientific organisations eg: INSERM and CNRS | hospitals |
| Who applies to them? | Presidents of Parliamentary Assembly, Members of the Government, Foundation of Public Usefulness, Public Organisation of Research. | CNRS: Administrative Council of the CNRS, or the Scientific Council of the CNRS or the General Director of the CNRS or the Ethics Committee itself | |
| Formal/Informal | Formal | CNRS: Formal | Informal |
| National/Regional | National | In research organisations | Local |
| Laws Involved (see below) | Decree No. 83-42 of 23rd February 1983 Amendments to the Law Hurriet-Serusclat of 20th December 1988 by the Law of 9th August 2004 |
CNRS: Decree no. 2000-1059 of 25 October 2000, Article 21-2 | |
| Guidance Involved | CNRS Charter | ||
| Membership requirements | 39 members and 1 president:
19 persons chosen for 'their competency and interest in ethical issues' 15 persons belonging to the research sector |
CNRS: 1 President chosen for 4 years by the General Director of the CNRS on the proposition of the Administrative Council. 12 members, scientists or persons coming from the civil society. | |
| Responsible/accountable to whom? | Independent | CNRS: Independent ethics committee near the Administrative Council of the CNRS. | |
| Mission | Give opinions especially on clinical ethics issues met in practice. | ||
| Approval or Advisory powers | Advisory powers. No legal effects. | Advisory | Advisory powers. No legal value. |
Not submitting research or failing to follow review
- It is an obligation to ask a CPP for its opinion on a research Protocol. Sanction: 1 year imprisonment and 15,000 Euros fine (Article L. 1126-5 of the Code of Public Health).
- It is an obligation to appeal to the National Consultative Committee for the processing of Information in the health sector and to the CNIL in case of processing personal data. Sanction: 5 years imprisonment and 300,000 Euros fine (Article 226-16 of the Penal Code).
- It is not compulsory to appeal to an Ethics Committee. However in the CNRS, the absence of appeal to the COPE could lead the CNRS not to renew the Research Unit.
Legal action that can be taken against RECs
None. Only the decision taken by the CNIL can be appealed to the Administrative Judge.
Links section
Laws
- Law no. 2004-801 of 6 August 2004 modifying the law Huriet-Sérusclat (in French).
- Decision for the creation of the Ethics Committee of the CNRS: Decision of the 20th August 2002 (in French).
- Code of the Public Health (in French)
- Ethics Committee of the CNRS: Decree n°2000-1059 of 25 October 2000.
- Law No 94-548 of the 1st July 1994 on the processing of personal data for purpose of research in the health sector (in French).
- Law Huriet-Sérusclat No 88-1138 of the 20th December 1988 on the protection of persons participating in Biomedical Research (in French.)
- Law No 78-17 of the 6th January 1978 on Informatics and Freedoms (in French).
- Legifrance - contains French legislation, codes and laws in preparation
Organisations and Ethics Committees
- National Consultative Ethics Committee
- List of the CCPPRBs -former CPP system before 2004 Law
- CNIL
- CNRS - COPE
- INSERM (in French & English)
Articles
- B. Le Mintier, Rapport sur " Les comités régionaux d'éthique en France : Réalités et perspectives ", Ministère de la justice, Ministère du travail et des affaires sociales, octobre 1998.
- Rapport sur " De l'éthique au droit en passant par la régulation professionnelle " sous la direction de B. Feuillet-Le Mintier, pour le Ministère du Travail et des affaires sociales et le Ministère de la justice, octobre 1999.
- Cordier, A. ‘Ethique et Professions de santé’, a report delivered to the Minister of Health, May 2003.
- Rapport sur " L'application des lois bioéthiques du 29 juillet 1994", sous la direction de B. Feuillet-Le Mintier, Mission de Recherche Droit et Justice, Ministère de la justice, octobre 1999.
See the REC bibliography section for more links and papers, and the Data Protection Page
